A young political loyalist has landed a national security leadership role that traditionally demands years of specialized experience.
Fugate graduated magna cum laude from the University of Texas at San Antonio last year, with a degree in politics and law. He used to work at a grocery store and as a gardener, but his professional career trajectory took off, beginning with a role as a special assistant in a Homeland Security immigration office.
In May, that position was expanded to include leadership of CP3, the government’s main platform for terrorism prevention, which oversees an $18 million grant program to help communities counter radicalization and targeted violence.
His appointment followed the resignation of former CP3 Director Bill Braniff, an Army veteran with over 20 years of national security experience. Braniff stepped down after staff reductions began at the center.
Braniff had been defending the office’s impact up until his departure. The 2024 report to Congress highlighted CP3’s funding of over 1,100 initiatives aimed at identifying violent extremism and intervening before attacks occur.
Now, CP3’s workforce has gone from around 80 to fewer than 20 employees, according to former workers. Fugate’s name surfaced gradually, catching the attention of terrorism prevention professionals and CP3 grantees, many of whom were unfamiliar with him.
They found no security experience listed on his now-deleted LinkedIn profile, where he appeared as a sharply dressed young man with a U.S. flag pin and no relevant employment in the field. According to the profile, his main leadership credential was serving as secretary general of a Model United Nations club.
A senior Homeland Security official told the outlet, ProPublica, via email, “Due to his success, he has been temporarily given additional leadership responsibilities in the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships office. This is a credit to his work ethic and success on the job.” The Independent and the Daily Mail have also confirmed this information.
Fugate’s rise appears closely tied to his political allegiance. His now-private Instagram documents a clear devotion to President Donald Trump, beginning at age 13 when he declared the politician a man with “the capacity for real and lasting change.”
Photos also showed him on the campaign trail, attending events in Washington and posing with Republican figures like Ben Carson and Matt Gaetz.
Critics suggest Fugate’s loyalty to Trump played a key role in his appointment to CP3, despite his lack of expertise. In conversations among Homeland Security staff and grantees, two theories have emerged.
DHS did not comment on either interpretation. However, CP3’s scope has noticeably shifted. Where it once concentrated on far-right extremism and domestic threats, its focus now includes drug cartels. Homeland Security insiders say this pivot reflects an overarching message that border security is now the agency’s top mission.
Several terrorism prevention initiatives have been handed off to state governments, and the administration has rejected accusations of neglect.
In an email, Trump administration spokesperson Abigail Jackson wrote, “The notion that this single office is responsible for preventing terrorism is not only incorrect, it’s ignorant.”
But officials who previously worked in the department say the White House is retreating from one of DHS’s founding missions.
The shooter had ties to white supremacist ideology. In May, a car bombing at a California fertility clinic killed the perpetrator, who left behind an anti-natalist screed.
These incidents have intensified scrutiny on CP3 and its readiness under Fugate’s stewardship. Though DHS’s budget request to Congress recommended ending the terrorism prevention grant program—saying it “does not align with DHS priorities”—the CP3 website still highlights the grants as essential.
Internally, staff have hinted at the possibility of another funding cycle, leaving the future of the program in limbo. For those who have worked with CP3, Fugate’s leadership symbolizes more than political favor—it reflects a broader institutional decline.
A grant recipient described the shift away from data-driven policy as “an insult” that undermines years of work aimed at moving beyond stigmatizing models that disproportionately targeted Muslim communities.
The administration’s internal decisions have also had chilling effects on staff. Employees reportedly fear retaliation and have avoided speaking publicly, citing alleged lie-detector tests and internal investigations ordered by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
A former DHS official summed up the growing concern, not with Fugate personally, but with the precedent his appointment sets. “The big story here is the undermining of democratic institutions,” the official said. “Who’s going to volunteer to be the next civil servant if they think their supervisor is an apparatchik?